Session 7: Mobile learning apps comparison - Grammaropolis and Jonny Grammar's Word Challenge
Session 7: Mobile learning apps comparison - Grammaropolis and Johnny Grammar's Word Challenge
Present and Compare Similar M-learning Apps Background: You are a group of experts on e-learning technology design. Locate 2-3 similar m-learning apps(good quality apps), analyze their similarities, differences, and rooms for improvement. Then, present it in a conference.
*This presentation only shows the powerpoint slides. There is no voice recording included
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-DQD1h_hL2W6-EG6CW6-_R1B0n2K7Baw
Colorful Interface! Your group always let me know new things!
ReplyDeleteYour introduction of Grammaropolis & Johnny Grammar's word challenge is very detailed but I am wondering that the tables of basic functionality can be designed more easy-to-read by making the text larger and locating the table at the middle position. The "rooms for improvement" part is brief but accurate and so as the comparison parts.
But I can't hear the voice. Is there any mistake in my operation?
Although both the applications, i.e. "Grammaropolis" and "Jonny Grammar's Word Challenge" aim on teaching children English through gamification, I guess they are serving different purposes - while "Grammaropolis" is an app which attracts and directs children to learn by themselves, "Jonny Grammar's Word Challenge" may be more useful as a test or a revision exercise.
ReplyDeleteYou have definitley compared Grammaropolis and Johnny Grammar's word challenge in a detailed way. The PPT is well organized and clear. However, I really can't hear any voice. Hope you can fix this problem as soon as possible!
ReplyDeleteYour introduction of the two apps; Grammaropolis and Johnny Grammar’s Word Challenge is very informative. I liked the manner in which you organised information, especially the introduction of both the apps as you showed a feature of the app and then added it to the table of functionalities. I agree that the two apps are similar, yet different as Grammaropolis is apt for self-directed learning, whereas Johnny Grammar’s Word Challenge is useful to evaluate learning.
ReplyDeleteWell, the only drawback of your PowerPoint is that I could not hear the recording.
Wow thanks for letting me know two interesting new tools! The design is quite suitable for children and the function is pretty useful! :)
ReplyDeleteThe design of comparison between these two apps is quite attractive and informative, which makes me have a try of these two apps. But you can play your voice for us, it would be more engaging.
ReplyDeleteYour group's presentation is very graphic as you use a lot of photos of the two apps, Grammaropolis and Johnny Grammar’s Word Challenge, in supporting your comments, which is very nice and clear. The similarities and differences part is also very well-organized. I am particularly interested in Johnny Grammar's word challenge as it is developed by the British Council, and the quality and QA should be better. Thanks for the recommendation! One drawback of the presentation is that there is no sound.
ReplyDeleteColour interface. Always something good to recommend ! well done !
ReplyDeleteIt is the first time I know this two software hhh. Your group presented a good comparison of Grammaropolis and Jonny Grammar's Word Challenge . I will download the software and have a try hhh
ReplyDeleteYou hit the points that I really concern what are the pros and cons while applying mobile application as a teaching tool. The “accessibility”, “how to login in”, “loading time” and “how many people can use it” are the considerations about the feasibility. In the classroom situation, different students have different types of mobile with different operation system, such as Android, iOs, new version, old version and different interfaces. Then I found they really do not know where downloading the app, how installing it, and how using it to conduct the lesson. Tutor may spend time to help fixing the problem.
ReplyDeleteThe two apps are very similar. I like the gamification setting in both apps. It will stimulate me to complete the challenge. And the way you present your result is also clear to readers.
ReplyDeleteYou recommended two Apps for children to learn about English,and I thinks those two Apps have different characters.They're impressive!
ReplyDeleteThe recommendation that I will give is that you can add the summary part that evoke the memories of us, to compare them more comprehensively.
Thanks for introducing two new apps of learning English for me. You have made the comparison of both similarities and differences in detailed. The PowerPoint slides are well-organized and easy to understand. It will be more attractive if the verbal explanation is included.
ReplyDeleteI cannot hear your voice = = According to your slides, you have done a clear introduction of the two English learning apps for children. I have several questions about them, do learners need to log in? Will their learning process be tracked? Can students choose the difficulty level? They are engaging because of the gamification learning mode, but I think learning apps for young students need to consider the foundation knowledge of students and how to keep their learning profile.
ReplyDeleteThe slides is more colourful of table and image of content that the learners like and enjoy the slide of learning. The ideas and content use by Google Slides to explain, the slides is powerful of information and ideas to explain the detail. Overall, we know different apps of pros and cons.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your sharing! According to your introduction about two apps, Grammaropolis and Johnny Grammar’s Word Challenge, the contents are very informative. Although the two apps are similar, they satisfy different target users. Besides, your design of slides are colorful, which can attract audiences' attention.
ReplyDeleteThe presentation is colorful associated with lots of pictures of two apps which are attractive and informative. I love most are the parts namely, "rooms for improvement", “similarities” and “The differences” are precise, especially of “basic functionality” which presents in a table format with relevant pictures, it would be more engaging.; however the text fonts in the table descriptions are a bit smaller as well as the sound didn’t functioned too!!
ReplyDelete